Discuss the structural strengths and weaknesses of each argument.

BUSN410 FORUM Learning Objective: Evaluate ethical implications of a decision. Evaluate decision-making outcomes and processes. Prompt: Read the various perspectives on the death penalty. The following articles are in the University Library Death throes https://harvardmagazine.com/2016/11/death-throes Gregg v Georgia https://www.nytimes.com/1976/07/03/archives/excerpts-from-decisions-by-supreme-court-justices-on-death-penalty.html and https://web.utk.edu/~scheb/decisions/Gregg.htm European Union http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com./content/entry/mcfcpus/european_union_memorandum_on_the_death_penalty/0 Instructions: Evaluate each argument for validity and soundness. Discuss the structural strengths and weaknesses of each argument. Discuss who has the stronger argument? Why? Your response must be in your own words. Your initial post should be 3 to 4 short paragraphs that reflect research, course content synthesis and reflection. Provide attribution for the source of your learning.