Read the Ethics Guide “Unseen Cyberazzi” on pages 248 & 249. A copy of the article in pdf format is included here: Unseen CyberazziPreview the document Write a 3-5 page paper answering questions 1-4. Remember to use the MEAL plan format in writing your arguments and support your arguments with outside sources. Make sure you review the grading rubric and follow it exactly! Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the students name, the professors name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. Include diagrams or screenshots created through the use of a snipping tool or print screen keyboard option. The completed diagrams / screenshots must be imported into the Word document before the paper is submitted. Rubric Module 5 Individual Writing Rubric Module 5 Individual Writing Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 1a Inverse of the Litmus Test 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if it is true that if personally unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if it is true that if personally unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if it is true that if personally unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 1.0 pts Insufficiently explains if it is true that if personally unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 1b Unethical Data Brokers 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if it is true that if data brokers are unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if it is true that if data brokers are unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if it is true that if data brokers are unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 1.0 pts Insufficiently explains if it is true that if data brokers are unwilling to publish behavior in NY Times it is unethical. Provides no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 2a Focused Junk Food marketing 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if it is unethical to focus junk food sales offers on a vulnerable segment. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if it is unethical to focus junk food sales offers on a vulnerable segment. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if it is unethical to focus junk food sales offers on a vulnerable segment. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 1.0 pts Insufficiently explains if it is unethical to focus junk food sales offers on a vulnerable segment. Provide no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 2b Ethical Ethnic Profiling 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if targeted marketing at a particular ethnic group is ethical. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if targeted marketing at a particular ethnic group is ethical. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if targeted marketing at a particular ethnic group is ethical. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 1.0 pts Insufficiently explains if targeted marketing at a particular ethnic group is ethical. Provide no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3a Gambling and Data Broker Behavior 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if the data broker’s behavior is ethical. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if the data broker’s behavior is ethical. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if the data broker’s behavior is ethical. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 1.0 pts Insufficiently explains if the data broker’s behavior is ethical. Provides no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3b It is the Gambling Vendor 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if the data broker’s posture absolves them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if the data broker’s posture absolves them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if the data broker’s posture absolves them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 1.0 pts Insufficiently explains if the data broker’s posture absolves them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provide no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3c It’s Grandma’s Fault 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if the vendor’s posture absolve them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if the vendor’s posture absolve them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if the vendor’s posture absolve them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 2.0 pts Insufficiently explains if the vendor’s posture absolve them of ethical considerations for Grandma’s losses. Provide no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 4 Purchased Business Intelligence 5.0 pts Thoroughly explains if the government’s purchase of BI data is unethical. Provides a solid argument in MEAL plan format with two references. 4.0 pts Satisfactorily explains if the government’s purchase of BI data is unethical. Provides a good argument with one or more references. 3.0 pts Partially explains if the government’s purchase of BI data is unethical. Provides somewhat of an argument with one reference. 2.0 pts Insufficiently explains if the government’s purchase of BI data is unethical. Provides no or very weak argument 0.0 pts Does not submit or incomplete 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 5 Mechanics (Grammar, Spelling, Language Usage, Sentence Structure, Citation Format) 10.0 pts 0-2 errors present Excellent command of language, proper use of grammar and writing conventions, few to no misspelled words, correct word choice, excellent variety and complexity of sentence structure, uses proper citation format 8.0 pts 3-4 errors present Good command of language, generally proper use of grammar and writing conventions, minimal misspelled words, largely good word choice, some variety and complexity in sentence structure, generally uses proper citation format 5.0 pts 5-6 errors present Generally proper use of grammar and writing conventions, but with simple sentences generally lacking variety/complexity in structure, acceptable citation format 3.0 pts 7-8 errors present Weak use of language, poor grammar, and numerous mechanical errors undermine coherence, weak citation format 0.0 pts More than 8 errors present Or Does not submit or incomplete pts Total Points:
Hide
